Last I checked "defending the potential kid diddler" fit more in that column bud.
Excuse me if I don't value your opinion there.
"Kiki's behaviour is incredibly gross and I don't like it but until there's actionable evidence of child abuse it's hard to make this go anywhere" is a real fucking weird sort of defending kid diddlingI'm not vagueposting.
I meant what I said in the rules, which you of course read and understood when you signed up for this forum.
If I end up having to purge people whoopenly defend someone who says they want to rape childrenahem, 'wish to engage in a nuanced and reasonable debate about the validity of supposed claims of a minor-attracted person', I will do so without hesitation or remorse.
I will not become known as 'Proctor Zakharov, the man who tolerates people effortposting about morally acceptable levels of paedophilia'. I have already given you an unbelievable level of clemency that I can confidently say no other web admin would ever give you. I don't think even Null would be this tolerant.
You are rapidly becoming an active brand risk, and I will not die on the hill you are trying to push me onto. But try and nudge me just a few more steps. Please.
How about you guys start actually reading the reponses you're getting instead of snapshotting single sentences so you can go off on fantasy crusades against imaginary paedophilia advocates in the community