I want to clarify that I am not opposed to new or missing info, I simply cannot add ALL the available info, some things I elected to cut because they simply do not have a strong enough reason to occupy space/add complexity to the chart. Cataloging additional tid-bits is better done with a wiki. Many of which already exist and do that job perfectly well.
I also work in a very... common law-ish way, if any one chart gets a new bit of info that is of a certain type or significance, then that to me sets precedent for ALL other charts to also get everything that is equivalent which I have previously omitted. This is the reason I elected to do something like cutting out HoloEarth from the Holo chart, since it was basically a game/metaverse platform, that would justify adding all of the other games/metaverse platforms from Brave and Gree and who knows what else in the future.
I debated on tying ember to Kallin because that would mean any other time a vtuber rebrands that justifies adding it, which would then open me up for dozens of hours researching extraneous past identities which is the very reason I banned PL, but I judged it a rare enough case to still add it.
It may seem silly but it comes from a simple desire to not take the easy way out, it would be very easy to fill the EN-centric charts with all kinds of info but have barebones documentation when it comes to very minor or foreign companies, I think that is bullshit, I want all aspects no matter their popularity to have equal representation and detail, and if that means some minor details of very well known agencies get cut then so be it.