I think a lot of people look at USA hegemony and it's in our nature to rebel against imbalances in power, even yanks love being the underdog in the rare situations they get to be like in sports they aren't known for. But the mistake is thinking that no USA hegemony means no hegemony, when in reality it means Chinese or Russian hegemony (Probably Chinese based on Russia's recent competency). So as an Australian am I going to want the world leader to be an imperfect Western society or a single-party state that only cares about itself? It's not a hard choice.