The labor court is NOT saying “Owozu was not bad to the girls and nothing bad happened here, and their accusations are false”.
What the tribunal is saying IS: “This is not a dispute between employee and employer but between two independent private parties. Even if they have evidence, we cannot say or sentence anything because as a labor court, we are not competent for these conflicts”.
Clearly here the problem was to bring a type of conflict to a court that does not see such types of conflicts. Nene and Rakkun's mistake was to believe that since it was a problem in their jobs, it could be seen by a labor court. But in reality, this is more of a civil issue.
The issue is people now saying that Owozu did nothing wrong even though Nene and the Oneeshi girls continue to maintain the statements that the managers are horrible, which may very well not be a regulatory fault, but wrong nonetheless.
It is clear that everyone in this controversy has no fucking idea of the law. Rakkun, Nene, the managers of Owozu do not understand the decision made by the court and that it is not “this one is right or wrong” but “this is not our business”.
Now what I do find fascinating is that this is the first time I have seen a court refer to the employment relationship between vtuber and agency, arguing that, as the talent's salary depends on donations and not on the employer, there is no relationship of subordination or dependence between employee and employer.
Therefore, this type of conflict could not be seen by a labor court because what there would be in reality is a collaboration or independent service. Therefore, the problem here would be a breach of contract between private parties.