I know you will just call this cringe but not all music needs to serve a political purpose.
He brought up specific
political grievances tho. Epstien et al. and the niggas in D.C sucking money from the working man. That's populist by definition. He just takes a psudo-generic centrist position, broadly, in the song and then clarifies that it skews center-left post initial interview(s) (at best). It's bad for right wingers to latch onto, which were the majority of enjoyers of his music. He has legitimate grievance to levy, but appeals, intentionally or not, that's up for debate, to right wingers and then signals left wing positions (immigration good lmao, "I ain't no stinking racist"). That's the problem, idiots are hoodwinked, likely unintentionally, by a retard. I reject the idea that this wasn't political. I reject that this is for only "forever online politsperg." Music influences and has consequences, they may be minor, but they exist.
The good thing regarding this escapade, by my viewing, is that there is a great market for genuine right wing art. It just needs to not be a shit lib at the helm. If you operate within the confines of your enemy's rule set you cannot best them (which he is in his attempts to placate the media et al). If they make the rules, you cannot use the rules against them, they control the deck. It's a power thing. The right in the United States lost their understand of how power works.
I do not think it is cringe for you to view this as positive, just that you lack perspective. This is all I will say on the matter, as I am a retard.