I wouldn't go that far. I played it for about three hours last night, and made it to Rose Town.SMRPG looks gorgeous but it's easier than before, you should be able to beat this game in one sitting.
I wouldn't go that far. I played it for about three hours last night, and made it to Rose Town.SMRPG looks gorgeous but it's easier than before, you should be able to beat this game in one sitting.
This is actually cool. I mean I never liked Uplink but I'm glad its on there now. Half-Life Source was always a gimmick that didn't quite work.Valve also updated the original release as documented here:
The Update's notable inclusions areHalf-Life
Half-Life is back and better than ever. Alongside interviews with the original developers, the game is now available with the Uplink mini-campaign, Steam Deck support, updated graphics settings, new multiplayer maps, and bonus restored goodies.half-life.com
- The Half Life Uplink demo that originally was a retail-only release is officially added to the game.
- Added Widescreen/4K support
- Steam Deck support.
- Added 4 brand new Valve-made maps for Deathmatch multi-player.
- Added an additional 3 maps exclusive to a rare retail released called Half Life: Further Data.
- Added new sprays for multi-player.
- Added 2 multiplayer models that were a retail-exclusive bonus.
- Added Ivan the Space Biker (aka proto-Gordon) and Alpha-build Barney to multi-player models.
- Changed the menu back to the WON Menu.
- Archived the original steam release under "beta branches" in options as "Steam Legacy" in case the update fucks some mods.
- Updated The Localization Files.
- Killed Half Life: Source (no longer promoted on steam, though you can still buy it).
Why would they? they have the largest and best storefront out there. Gaben is clearly more interested in tech then in gaming. they own a few really good ip's that people still want to make games for which Gaben will once in a blue moon approve.Valve will do anything but release a new fucking game. Jesus Christ.
They're actually doing it
They're actually doing it
Then the Madame Web trailer they released and it's going to be Ghostbusters 2016 again
View attachment 56419
The negro with an afro is suppose to be Mattie Franklin, so they negro'fied one of the characters.And unless im missing something the framing device of the movie is an escort quest rather then "lets genderswap because we need to pander" which is something in the vein of super heroes (the escort quest hell Logan actually did it excellently)
Not a high bar when nearly everything after Endgame was a dumpster fire, especially stuff like Antman 3 and The Marvels. The director doesn't have anything amazing to their catalog, they basically do like 2-3 episodes of work on some series. One of the most notable credits is a few episodes of Season 4 of Dexter, which was heavily carried by the actors and not so much the writing or directing.So untill i learn more ive seen worse marvel films
meh sticker me autistic if you want good films get shit trailers all the time.
And unless im missing something the framing device of the movie is an escort quest rather then "lets genderswap because we need to pander" which is something in the vein of super heroes (the escort quest hell Logan actually did it excellently)
So untill i learn more ive seen worse marvel films though i will jump ship if they imply the other ladies are supposed to be (hero names here)
That being said Madame Web was always a mess of a character from a mess of a story which tried to be grand and epic while everyone reading only really cared about the funni spidermen that might show up.
The negro with an afro is suppose to be Mattie Franklin, so they negro'fied one of the characters.
Not a high bar when nearly everything after Endgame was a dumpster fire, especially stuff like Antman 3 and The Marvels. The director doesn't have anything amazing to their catalog, they basically do like 2-3 episodes of work on some series. One of the most notable credits is a few episodes of Season 4 of Dexter, which was heavily carried by the actors and not so much the writing or directing.
Sony is extremely retarded. They had a free pass after No Way Home to bring back Andrew Garfield as a Spider-Man they could use without having to worry about Disney. Instead they decided to do this film and the Kraven film. As shit as the Kraven film may look like, I have more faith in it because the director of it wrote and directed Margin Call.
Sort of. The Russo brothers and James Gunn had plenty of influence and their films stood out the most. However it is like you said and a lot of the films just started trying to mimic the Guardians of the Galaxy formula for making a film after that came out though. After GotG, there was no more films with "genre" styles like Thor being Shakespearean, Captain America being War Pulp, or Winter Soldier being Political Thriller. The one director post endgame that appeared to have the most influence on their film was Waititi but then ended up with Thor: Love and Thunder, which even the Marvel fanboys don't bother defending.For all of the cultural arson that Marvel is invested in, their actual biggest mistake (and what has doomed them) was "casting" directors rather than hiring creatives. The named director barely has any influence on the actual project, even if they do direct the non-action sequences. It's meant there's very little style to the films and everything is forgettable. The only highlights end up being actors knocking it out of the park, occasionally.
i have zero comprehension on how the guy who made the funni hitler movie and Thor the Abridgining (ragnarok is essentially 5 different thor arcs mashed together) made Love and Thunder.Sort of. The Russo brothers and James Gunn had plenty of influence and their films stood out the most. However it is like you said and a lot of the films just started trying to mimic the Guardians of the Galaxy formula for making a film after that came out though. After GotG, there was no more films with "genre" styles like Thor being Shakespearean, Captain America being War Pulp, or Winter Soldier being Political Thriller. The one director post endgame that appeared to have the most influence on their film was Waititi but then ended up with Thor: Love and Thunder, which even the Marvel fanboys don't bother defending.
The management of Marvel movies changed after Endgame. They either hire the director to fit a quota and it's really run by the producers OR the incumbent director has all of the pull and no pushback. There's nothing competent about production management, but that's generally a Hollywood problem anyway.i have zero comprehension on how the guy who made the funni hitler movie and Thor the Abridgining (ragnarok is essentially 5 different thor arcs mashed together) made Love and Thunder.