To be fair, he clarified that he meant they shouldn't ban discussion and literature in general as banning controversial topics leads to worse outcomes than allowing society to naturally and socially reject it. From what's written it sounds like it's run of the mill "don't burn books" type of argument using an extreme example.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.