"Vote with your wallet" does not work in the modern age, since it's playing directly into these people's hands. Their entire game plan is to insert themselves into everything you like and shit it up until it makes you miserable and you leave. They don't have capitalistic interest in it, they just get off on the idea of defeating you, even at high-level corporate positions.
The only way to "win" is to either fight back against them, or find yourself little scraps of joy despite them.
It's never really worked, it's a gay-op meant to supplant and dilute actual efforts towards change.
Let's take the massive
Coors boycotts that happened in the US. These boycotts lasted for 20 years, and involved entire ethnic groups (almost all Hispanics and African Americans were supporting the boycott), involved feminist rights groups, involved America's largest and most powerful worker's union organizations, and as an added bonus was a massive rallying point for the nation's LGBT (most of whom still don't drink Coors to this day).
What was the impact? Coors is still there. They lost some market share in a couple states, but expanded elsewhere nationally to make up for it. They didn't
stop growing over those 20 years, it was just a bit slower. They didn't start hiring more women, or minorities, or whoever; they didn't even reinstitute the Coors union that had started the boycotts by going on strike. And this is supposed to be one of the most successful boycotts in American history, one they teach morons about in college as a trend-setter for the rest of the nation's activists.
Even the Sons of Liberty (you know, those guys who eventually sparked the American Revolution) tried boycotts, they boycotted everyone who even thought about purchasing British tea. It didn't actually DO anything until they destroyed the tea in harbor, the East India Company had been stockpiling too much tea for years at that point and was perfectly willing to just let the tea sit in harbor until it sold. It wasn't even worth that much (1.7 million when adjusted to modern day money). If the EIC hadn't already been in dire financial straits, to the point of being bailed out by the British government, they could have let it go. Hell, a few Tories even went to Britain and offered to pay the cost out of their own pocket to avoid conflict and Parliament turned them down.
Also,
@TRIGG3RP0INT is gay and lame, thanks for setting a massive beacon inviting every twit-tard and their mother in here for internet clout.