Being able to publicly announce who you were and have magazines etc. talk about it would be huge, if only for the talents' confidence when moving on.I'm not sure what actually changes here if someone still has the name they performed with but entirely different social media accounts and a model legally-distinct from what they had with a company before leaving.
It's aimed at talent agencies and entertainment companies who take ownership of their talents' stage names, which is a real problem, but it will work for vtubers too.We're viewing all this from a chuuba perspective but we're likely more niche case and with corpos likely being more assertive about retaining ownership of vtuber names and models/likeness.
Of course it will override any contracts, that's the point of having laws like this. The Japanese legal system is dumb but not that dumb.Yeah, this thing is basically completely worthless for vtubers unless it overrides their NDA.
True but it cuts both ways. Other than, like, Sony, vtuber companies suing ex talents would be a big risk and cost a lot of money even if they win.companies might want to start arguing copyright in court, which is a very expensive and time-consuming legal battle that you're going to lose even if you win.
If the result is forcing the talent to be credited under a name they own (not necessarily their real name) then I'm all for it. Corpos don't recast departed talents either so there's not really any loss. As I've said before, something like the Takarazuka Revue openly credits their performers under their real names and it doesn't break the immersion or cause any problems.ruling that corpo chuubas can keep their name after they leave would be dumb as fuck and sounds like it would cause all kinds of legal nightmares