Sorry for the double post but I don't think this fits with my joke above.
View attachment 86176View attachment 86177
VTuberのニュース公正取引委員会が発表独占禁止法上問題があるとする行為に新見解芸名やグループ名の使用制限が含まれておりVtuber事務所を退所した方が名前を使えるようになる可能性があります公取委は問題行為をまとめた報告書を近く公表し、是正を促す。引用画像は読売新聞オンライン
VTuber News: The Fair Trade Commission announces new opinion on actions deemed problematic under the Antimonopoly ActIncludes restrictions on the use of stage names and group names.People who leave a Vtuber agency may be able to use their names again. The Japan Fair Trade Commission will soon publish a report summarizing problematic behavior and urge them to correct it.Image taken from Yomiuri Shimbun Online
芸名(クリエイター名)については、仮に事務所が考えたとしても、その芸名(クリエイター名)を使用している本人に帰属します(東京高裁令和2年7月10日 事件番号令元(ラ)2075号 判例時報 No.2486)。実写配信を認めてるからね、芸名でしかない
Even if a firm thinks of a stage name (creator's name), it belongs to the person who uses it (Tokyo High Court, July 10, 2020, Case No. 2075, Hanrei Jiho No. 2486).
They allow live-action distribution, so it's just a stage name.
Yes, but this is only an opinion of/study by the JFTC so far.And what does it mean: that vtubers who quit companies can continue to use their names, they've used under companies?
It'd be funny but both doki and mint are bigger than their old persona at this point, it make no sense to give out thousands of dollars to riggers and designers for nothing but shit and giggles. I also believe most people who has left long enough at this point are too well bonded with their post-corpo persona to give it up.This is an interesting ruling, names can be one of the more recognizable things about a chuuba, and considering there is alot of precedents of people using similar designs or the same artists this could bring some interesting implications for chuubas who dont have the best relation with their old companies. I wonder if Doki could just get a purple wig and some breast enhancement and Mint can make the fairy design canon
"The Japan Fair Trade Commission will soon publish a report summarizing problematic behavior and urge them to correct it"Yes, but this is only an opinion of/study by the JFTC so far.
Do you know Doki? I don't think she'd do it, but she's thrown more money away for lessit make no sense to give out thousands of dollars to riggers and designers for nothing but shit and giggles.
counter point: bitch is now broke and will continue to be brokeDo you know Doki? I don't think she'd do it, but she's thrown more money away for less
This will be a very Kiara stream.
Please do tell us again about the state of doki's finances.counter point: bitch is now broke and will continue to be broke
But I can see them doing a bit where they use badly drawn stick figures and refer to themselves as Pomu & selen as an one-off thing.
Please do it it will be so funny.
"My full Name is Uruha Rushia Mikeneko but you guys can call me la Rusita Loca Miguel"Sorry for the double post but I don't think this fits with my joke above.
View attachment 86176View attachment 86177
VTuberのニュース公正取引委員会が発表独占禁止法上問題があるとする行為に新見解芸名やグループ名の使用制限が含まれておりVtuber事務所を退所した方が名前を使えるようになる可能性があります公取委は問題行為をまとめた報告書を近く公表し、是正を促す。引用画像は読売新聞オンライン
VTuber News: The Fair Trade Commission announces new opinion on actions deemed problematic under the Antimonopoly ActIncludes restrictions on the use of stage names and group names.People who leave a Vtuber agency may be able to use their names again. The Japan Fair Trade Commission will soon publish a report summarizing problematic behavior and urge them to correct it.Image taken from Yomiuri Shimbun Online
芸名(クリエイター名)については、仮に事務所が考えたとしても、その芸名(クリエイター名)を使用している本人に帰属します(東京高裁令和2年7月10日 事件番号令元(ラ)2075号 判例時報 No.2486)。実写配信を認めてるからね、芸名でしかない
Even if a firm thinks of a stage name (creator's name), it belongs to the person who uses it (Tokyo High Court, July 10, 2020, Case No. 2075, Hanrei Jiho No. 2486).
They allow live-action distribution, so it's just a stage name.
Blink twice if you need help.Tenma is always cute, of course!
(No, I am not saying this under duress, why do you ask?)
The study is broadly about the JP entertainment industry though, no? I think most of the salient points in the translated table are more generally targeted towards the idol industry given how it being so rife with abusive and unfair treatment of talent is pretty much an open-secret at this point. We're viewing all this from a chuuba perspective but we're likely more niche case and with corpos likely being more assertive about retaining ownership of vtuber names and models/likeness.Interesting, but the character model and social media accounts will still be the property of the company, which is what a talent also really wants. I'm not sure what actually changes here if someone still has the name they performed with but entirely different social media accounts and a model legally-distinct from what they had with a company before leaving.
Yeah, this thing is basically completely worthless for vtubers unless it overrides their NDA.The study is broadly about the JP entertainment industry though, no? I think most of the salient points in the translated table are more generally targeted towards the idol industry given how it being so rife with abusive and unfair treatment of talent is pretty much an open-secret at this point. We're viewing all this from a chuuba perspective but we're likely more niche case and with corpos likely being more assertive about retaining ownership of vtuber names and models/likeness.
Singko (Arcane and LoL edition)