Banter/Off-topic Thread & Community Stoning Platform

[Aquatic Novellite]

Right now it's only too fast for superduper, and I genuinely think he might have a learning disability, because no normal human reads that slowly.

It's just autism. Normal humans would simply skip the hundred pages to the present.

 

[shipmate_F]

Capipis don't deserve voting rights, they unleashed Hexa upon the forum.

I'm not one and I voted for unleashing her in general. It was amusing at first and the payout was spetacular, you can't say it was a bad thing in hindsight.

 

[BlueSharkTV]

I'm not one and I voted for unleashing her in general. It was amusing at first and the payout was spetacular, you can't say it was a bad thing in hindsight.

>Pipproject Producer

 

[shipmate_F]

>Pipproject Producer

Hey I can appreciate the filthy bunny and do something for the bros (and some money) without having her as my oshi.

 

[Rinfriend]

Right now it's only too fast for superduper, and I genuinely think he might have a learning disability, because no normal human reads that slowly.

To be fair, the general thread goes very quickly. However, he definitely has a learning disability either way. It’s superduper, you see.

second hand embarrassment caused by increase of proctors activity on x.com

I use twitter too often for my own good, my brain is not yet rotten enough so I can tell you this is very true.
Honestly, I feel like its become a problem, but it’s not deadly I guess. I just care about the reputation of the forum because I like this place and what it does for VTubing. Obviously, what people think of him bleeds out into what people think of this place.

 

[BlueSharkTV]

Hey I can appreciate the filthy bunny and do something for the bros (and some money) without having her as my oshi.

> Video unavailable Watch on YouTube

 

[The Proctor]

@The Proctor this is what people think bossman. It's been two weeks and basically nobody except the fag likes the change and EVERYONE here is a regular user. I really think you should put it to a public vote and end this charade, the forum simply does not have enough people to support split generals anymore and we only LOOSING frequent posters, not gaining them.

A potential loss of users due to the nature of the transition was anticipated during the planning stage and deemed acceptable in order to accomplish the goals that staff laid out. Two weeks is in no way a sufficient amount of time to judge the results of this transition.

This is the new status quo. It will not be reverting. You are welcome to suggest alternatives and expansions of the existing topic range, or extra add-ons that will make the new site experience easier to navigate and pleasant to use, but that is it.

I am enjoying the new atmosphere in the new threads. I see people positively discussing things that would previously have gotten multiple sarcastic 'LITERALLY WHO?' or similar derogatory comments in the general thread. The majority of complaints are people talking about having to do 5% more work than before to find content they want. I do not consider these to be substantive criticisms.

In regards to the accusations of the new threads being hugboxes as worthy of consideration, I have a different interpretation. Members have become very used to having control over one general thread. Within the single-thread structure, just a few people can easily suppress any viewpoints they disagree with and push any conversations they don't want to partake in out of consideration. Over time, this has created a very insular view of differing opinions, and an internal culture that is designed to be impenetrable to most of them.

As a result, the same talking points are repeated and reinforced, and challenging them becomes progressively harder. The illusion of openness is maintained because established users with good track records of not rocking the boat are able to sometimes suggest new ideas or avenues of discussion that don't threaten the overall culture that has developed, but radical new ideas are rejected and considered dangerous.

I do not view this as healthy, and I take the negative reactions towards the new threads and the arguments that took place during their initial creation as justification for their implementation, rather than a reason to rescind their existence. A community that cannot endure the sight of other people posting about things they personally disagree with, in their own spaces, which they must voluntarily expose themselves to in order to even be aware of, is not a healthy community. I consider disrupting this status quo to be worth a short-term fall in user activity, and I hope that others will come to agree with that assessment as time passes.

We have a VShojo thread?

I've restored the 'New Threads' sidebar display so that new threads will actually get the proper exposure they need. I apologize for not accounting for how used people are to there not being any new ones until now.

 

[Sankisei]

Hey I can appreciate the filthy bunny and do something for the bros (and some money) without having her as my oshi.

A better songs about friendship

I just miss the interaction with other vtuber fans that took place in the general thread

 

[NeneLOVE]

A potential loss of users due to the nature of the transition was anticipated during the planning stage and deemed acceptable in order to accomplish the goals that staff laid out. Two weeks is in no way a sufficient amount of time to judge the results of this transition.

This is the new status quo. It will not be reverting. You are welcome to suggest alternatives and expansions of the existing topic range, or extra add-ons that will make the new site experience easier to navigate and pleasant to use, but that is it.

I am enjoying the new atmosphere in the new threads. I see people positively discussing things that would previously have gotten multiple sarcastic 'LITERALLY WHO?' or similar derogatory comments in the general thread. The majority of complaints are people talking about having to do 5% more work than before to find content they want. I do not consider these to be substantive criticisms.

In regards to the accusations of the new threads being hugboxes as worthy of consideration, I have a different interpretation. Members have become very used to having control over one general thread. Within the single-thread structure, just a few people can easily suppress any viewpoints they disagree with and push any conversations they don't want to partake in out of consideration. Over time, this has created a very insular view of differing opinions, and an internal culture that is designed to be impenetrable to most of them.

As a result, the same talking points are repeated and reinforced, and challenging them becomes progressively harder. The illusion of openness is maintained because established users with good track records of not rocking the boat are able to sometimes suggest new ideas or avenues of discussion that don't threaten the overall culture that has developed, but radical new ideas are rejected and considered dangerous.

I do not view this as healthy, and I take the negative reactions towards the new threads and the arguments that took place during their initial creation as justification for their implementation, rather than a reason to rescind their existence. A community that cannot endure the sight of other people posting about things they personally disagree with, in their own spaces, which they must voluntarily expose themselves to in order to even be aware of, is not a healthy community. I consider disrupting this status quo to be worth a short-term fall in user activity, and I hope that others will come to agree with that assessment as time passes.



I've restored the 'New Threads' sidebar display so that new threads will actually get the proper exposure they need. I apologize for not accounting for how used people are to there not being any new ones until now.

Expected response.

Well whatever, I tried. Ima go back to charting and watching the fireworks.

 

[Compressed jpg]

we're VT now boys

 

[Punished Anime Discusser]

>Pipproject Producer

We didn't choose the forum equivalent of a star of David, it was given to us.

 

[Egg the Boiled]

I don't have much to add that people haven't already said. But as someone who watches a variety of indie and corpo vtubers, I really can't be bothered keeping up with threads. I'll check the last few comments and don't bother to backread. It's not really fun to read.

Maybe that's the goal- to flush out the lurkers and make a bunch of annoying cliques?

I will be fair though, two weeks probably is too short a time to judge properly. Still think this will go poorly.

 

[Godzilla1984]

If /vt/ and TVA had a baby, would it be a retarded gay baby, or a gay retarded baby?

 

[agility_]

This is the new status quo. It will not be reverting. You are welcome to suggest alternatives and expansions of the existing topic range, or extra add-ons that will make the new site experience easier to navigate and pleasant to use, but that is it.

I am enjoying the new atmosphere in the new threads. I see people positively discussing things that would previously have gotten multiple sarcastic 'LITERALLY WHO?' or similar derogatory comments in the general thread. The majority of complaints are people talking about having to do 5% more work than before to find content they want. I do not consider these to be substantive criticisms.

We were never that negative or violently rejectful. You're painting us as the /vt/ all-stars and I resent that. Maybe my view is skewed because I don't have to read mod report tickets, but I don't think we are such grotesquely unmanageable group that "needed to be taught a lesson".

 

[Compressed jpg]

If /vt/ and TVA had a baby, would it be a retarded gay baby, or a gay retarded baby?

Stillborn.

Also change

to something that reads like someones mother passed away. Not that you scored a confirmed hit on an ISIS General.

 

[NeneLOVE]

We were never that negative or violently rejectful. You're painting us as the /vt/ all-stars and I resent that. Maybe my view is skewed because I don't have to read mod report tickets, but I don't think we are such grotesquely unmanageable group that "needed to be taught a lesson".

We Who?'d one too many times at random indie #546732-b bossman was trying to shill that week and this is price we have to pay.

 

[Godzilla1984]

We Who?'d one too many times at random indie #546732-b bossman was trying to shill that week and this is price we have to pay.

The inbred potato farmer wants to breed outside his gene pool, but, alas, cannot.

 

[Egg the Boiled]

You're painting us as the /vt/ all-stars and I resent that.

The impression I get is that Proctor hates most of the people on his forum and we're always unruly children who are wrong. The Discord are the beloved saints.

We Who?'d one too many times at random indie #546732-b bossman was trying to shill that week and this is price we have to pay.

I like seeing random indies but it's always funny when they're brought up like they're important.

 

[Abomination]

Oh well. It is what it is, I suppose. I'll keep sticking around as long as the discussions to be had are still fun.

 

[Kazuma]

Well there's still the KF vtuber thread if TVA dies