Bruh.
"Hagu? HAGU!?! Oi,oi kaigainiki, ey, I'm watching you"Kaminari Clara
-
🔥The VTuber Sinder has been exposed by Bao and others in Google Docs for alleged malicious behavior.🔥 >>> ☢ Containment Thread ☢
🪳VShojo parts way with Matara Kan, effective May 5th, 2025.🪳
🖋Ike Eveland of Nijisanji EN abruptly graduates and has his channel wiped of all content.🖋
🎤The new Phase Invaders turn out to be Clio Aite, MariMari_en and SleepyProject.🎤
Twitter cringe and insanity
- Thread starter Trap Supremacy
- Start date
Funny how after they got BTFO'd in 2024 suddenly they don't like the popular vote anymore. It was way over 50% the day after, they spent weeks "finding votes" before finally giving up on trying to erode it away completely.
If fags like Bint are the majority then why can't they keep their woke brands from going broke and abandoning them in order to stay in business?
Did this homie think all the people that dislike woke shit are Americans or Trump Supporters??? Something I always noted about progressives is how gringocentric they are.
The other problem with Bint is how simplistic his analysis is, putting all people that opposed him under one banner and believe everyone is the same strawman.
Also not willing to admit that HE is also part of a minority, a minority that think it is okay to do harassment to vtubers that play Hogwarts Legacy or throw shit at a vtuber for the type of hair she uses.
Dont let his tweets about american politics deceive you. Bint is 100% a seamonkey. He only started speaking about american politics when he could get a following out of if.
I know that. Fags like him rage on because they know the big pushback started here and is spreading back out through the rest of the world and that endangers their grift.
Well, I guess it's that time to do this again:
"NBINTED IS A CRAZY RETARD" ANALYTICSThey are now at 29.4k posts as of May 6th, an increase of 5,600 posts over 52 days, for a posting rate of 107 posts per day.
I seem to recall him starting shit in FagEye's discord and FagEye called him out for being a SEA creature
Why do we allow SEA access to the internet because the negatives far outweigh the positives and the web would be a better place without them shitting up everythingWell, I guess it's that time to do this again:
My previous analysis had him at 23.8k posts on March 15th with a rate of 92 posts per day.
They are now at 29.4k posts as of May 6th, an increase of 5,600 posts over 52 days, for a posting rate of 107 posts per day.
I seem to recall him starting shit in FagEye's discord and FagEye called him out for being a SEA creature
I wonder if he is the same retard that got caught spamming shit on 8chan.Well, I guess it's that time to do this again:
My previous analysis had him at 23.8k posts on March 15th with a rate of 92 posts per day.
They are now at 29.4k posts as of May 6th, an increase of 5,600 posts over 52 days, for a posting rate of 107 posts per day.
I seem to recall him starting shit in FagEye's discord and FagEye called him out for being a SEA creature
On my last clip I had a small 25 second section related to all of his Kirsche posts. I estimated he has around 200 posts just on her. He has a similar number on PurpleKeemstar but hasnt posted much about him recently.
mental illnessWell, I guess it's that time to do this again:
My previous analysis had him at 23.8k posts on March 15th with a rate of 92 posts per day.
They are now at 29.4k posts as of May 6th, an increase of 5,600 posts over 52 days, for a posting rate of 107 posts per day.
I seem to recall him starting shit in FagEye's discord and FagEye called him out for being a SEA creature
didn't there used to be a segregated internet thing?
can we bring that back? let mental illness defeat mental illness for a couple of years the victors will be allowed to join polite society as entertainment.
Quite the opposite, actually. The rumors were all over the cold war, presumably as part of the Wehrmacht rehabilitation effort, but when the iron curtain fell and people got access to the Soviet documents, it turned out that no such plans existed.
One might of course suspect foul play, but if that was the case, there'd be hints. Either supposedly contemporary documents actually post dating it, or incongruous passages in various documents that only make sense if something is missing. Neither is the case. The most that has been found has been a halfway panicky plan for a pre emptive attack in May 1941, when German deployments along the border were becoming increasingly impossible to miss.
Meanwhile, Soviet deployments did, contrary to often heard claims, not particularly match an offensive plan. Or a defensive one. Or any plan at all, really. Their rather haphazard deployment was, in fact, awful for all situations, and likely pushed by administrative rather than operational needs.
The ones who did make up shit about the Soviet plans after the war were the German generals, who went all "The Soviets were going to invade us if we weren't going to strike first, ahhhhhh!" yet the actual contemporary German sources say the exact opposite. To quote Franz Halder: “After all, we cannot expect them to do us the favor of attacking."
Needless to say, his claims after the war diverged substantially from his diary entries during it.
Stalin did, of course, wish to expand. That's why he allied with Hitler to invade Poland, annex the Baltic States, invade Finland and get a slice off Romania. During the war he went after Bulgaria (German ally against Yugoslavia and Greece, but hadn't declared war on the USSR), and after the war, threatened Yugoslavia, Greece, Turkey and Iran (leading to stern American letters telling him to back off or else).
The crucial difference is that where Hitler liked rolling the dice on grand campaigns, Stalin wanted easily winnable wars. He was cautious and unwilling to roll the dice, instead arranging things so he'd have no way of losing, and never risking everything.
Where Hitler dreamt, Stalin was focused entirely on the achievable. As a result, there was no serious plan to invade Germany, and no way he'd have risked such a thing unless the western front looked like it did in December 1944, with Germany on the ropes and unable to refocus.
Also keep in mind the rather lopsided tooth to tail ratio of the red army. Without lend lease trucks and fuel, Soviet logistics simply weren't capable of supporting a sweeping offensive into Europe. A significant factor in Soviet strategic planning.
In a remarkable feat of irony, to get a Red Alert style Soviet invasion of Europe, you'd need Hitler in the Kremlin, and Ford to set up shop in the Donbas.
One might of course suspect foul play, but if that was the case, there'd be hints. Either supposedly contemporary documents actually post dating it, or incongruous passages in various documents that only make sense if something is missing. Neither is the case. The most that has been found has been a halfway panicky plan for a pre emptive attack in May 1941, when German deployments along the border were becoming increasingly impossible to miss.
Meanwhile, Soviet deployments did, contrary to often heard claims, not particularly match an offensive plan. Or a defensive one. Or any plan at all, really. Their rather haphazard deployment was, in fact, awful for all situations, and likely pushed by administrative rather than operational needs.
The ones who did make up shit about the Soviet plans after the war were the German generals, who went all "The Soviets were going to invade us if we weren't going to strike first, ahhhhhh!" yet the actual contemporary German sources say the exact opposite. To quote Franz Halder: “After all, we cannot expect them to do us the favor of attacking."
Needless to say, his claims after the war diverged substantially from his diary entries during it.
Stalin did, of course, wish to expand. That's why he allied with Hitler to invade Poland, annex the Baltic States, invade Finland and get a slice off Romania. During the war he went after Bulgaria (German ally against Yugoslavia and Greece, but hadn't declared war on the USSR), and after the war, threatened Yugoslavia, Greece, Turkey and Iran (leading to stern American letters telling him to back off or else).
The crucial difference is that where Hitler liked rolling the dice on grand campaigns, Stalin wanted easily winnable wars. He was cautious and unwilling to roll the dice, instead arranging things so he'd have no way of losing, and never risking everything.
Where Hitler dreamt, Stalin was focused entirely on the achievable. As a result, there was no serious plan to invade Germany, and no way he'd have risked such a thing unless the western front looked like it did in December 1944, with Germany on the ropes and unable to refocus.
Also keep in mind the rather lopsided tooth to tail ratio of the red army. Without lend lease trucks and fuel, Soviet logistics simply weren't capable of supporting a sweeping offensive into Europe. A significant factor in Soviet strategic planning.
In a remarkable feat of irony, to get a Red Alert style Soviet invasion of Europe, you'd need Hitler in the Kremlin, and Ford to set up shop in the Donbas.
>Afghanistan
>Afghanistan again 3 years later
>Xinjiang
>Finland
no one said he was good at it.
Yes. These people actually believe that the entire rest of the world agrees with them, and only American Trump supporters are standing in their way of achieving the world that they want. They are hilariously wrong about this.
To be fair, on paper there was no reason to expect that the Soviets wouldn't be able to win in Finland. They weren't expecting an entire country of Simo Häyhäs.
Nah, it looked bad on paper too. They attacked finland IN WINTER. Though it have massive defensive advantage all year because swamps.
look man sometimes you see the +50% defense terrain bonus and you forget to add it.
If we had a segregated internet there would be like five white posters left on this site.
107 a day on just Twitter? Or does that factor in all socials? Either way... Christ.
The Soviets would have eventually invaded into Germany, but I think it would have been like 1946 before that ever happened. However, I do think, without Operation Barbarossa, the Soviets would have been setting up to invade Southern Europe through Romania. Though the events of 1940 and then 1941 rather derailed those plans for a while.
Hitler's move on the USSR was actually the correct move, strategically speaking, but for about a dozen incredibly dumb & evil things they did. If they just cut a deal with the UK, even, they'd have had the resources more than necessary. I don't think they were planning to move into Germany quite that quickly, mostly because it was still the Russians. If they're doing something dumb, 50% chance it involves the Black Sea. See... the last 500 years.
Stalin was great at gaining something at the horrific cost of everything they threw at the attempt.
Thankfully, he wasn't.
The Soviets made the grand miscalculation of thinking everyone fought like Communists. Which is horribly incompetently.
Many a strategy game saves died to that, lol.
The deal Hitler repeatedly offered and the UK just as repeatedly rejected? Cutting a deal required both sides to agree, and the UK wasn't agreeing.
Similar threads
