Vaguely related to the Niji-African-American discussion, but this line from the suspension notice is why I have a problem with the corpos being dependent on permission from game publishers:
View attachment 16207
During the stream there is a genuine concern the publisher will revoke permission if the streamers are too critical of the game, to the point where management will hand out suspensions to cover themselves. It's the "if we give this a 3/10 we won't get a review code next time" problem dialed up to 11, meaning that while independent streams (from flesh and virtual personalities) can double up as a "buyer's guide" review based off the streamer's impressions while playing, corpo streamers are plagued by a conflict of interest that ultimately just makes their streams long-form advertisements.
This is something I've never liked about Japan's approach to derivative material. At least we can reasonably rip into US-based game journalists and internet personalities for selling out; Japanese-based ones are legally required to provide coverage on the publishers' terms so they can't possibly give fair coverage.