Even if it is 0.1, it is still negative opportunity cost.When you dumb things down too much you run into the mistake of giving people ammunition
If phase connect generate 20 coffee beans/month (I refuse to use vbucks as a currency)
It would look more like this:
Pippa generate 8 coffee beans/month
Tenma generate 4 coffee beans/month
Lumi generates 4 coffee beans/month
Uruka generates 3 coffee beans/month
Hina generates 0.1 coffee bean
The rest cover the missing 0.9 coffee bean
Edit: I can't math
Proctor is arguing Hina generate so little it doesn't matter and not make sense to punish her. If pippa on the other hand decided to stop and you lose that 10 coffee beans/month. Things will certainly be dealt differently than the way Hina situation was handled.
At least that's what I hope Proctor is arguing, I didn't read most of his paragraphs
I'm just pointing out your argument is flawed.
I'm just saying that it isn't nothing, as it is still less than before.
I simplified it intentionally as he argued that a missing talent is net-neutral. Which it just isn't .
Is the impact different between talents? Definitely.
Is the impact less the larger your company is? Also yes.
But it is NOT nothing.
That's what all my argument was about.
And that's why I don't see it as flawed.