Because if they wanted to be treated as "natal" do, they will no longer be treated as "trans".
I disagree
they would totally pick that shit up only to live out their fantasy of being a trailer park crack whore with 5 stds and a malnourished kid, if they are AGP.
From my experience, trans people (for simplicity I'll be considering MtF here) can largely be grouped into 2 categories. First you have the people with gender dysphoria. Whether you agree that transitioning is the proper course of care or not, these people tend to just try to live their lives as the opposite sex and try to deal with their mental illness (non-derrogatory, just like we can talk about people with depression or BPD as having mental illnesses without being derrogatory) without drawing too much attention to the fact that they're trans. If you had a magic wand that would alter history and genetics and have made them born a woman, they would happily accept. This group wants to be women.
What I'm saying is that you don't need those people. Especially if you have a global market.
Hitler just attained Nirvana. Hard to distinguish from autism, I know.
I think there are a bunch of relevant subcategories.
Autists are able to amass substantial followings on the internet, among fellow retards.
1- 9: Retards who cannot differentiate between fantasy and reality.
Sargon just keeps winning, somewhere out there he's smuckling about this one.
I've seen it posted around more and more in an unironic way. Only in modern day Goymerica do you see people fighting fascism by throwing molotovs and burning holocaust survivors to death.
There is probably a lot of overlap in those latter categories.
Yeah but don't you think there are a suspicious number of Holocaust survivors. Like ones that are suspiciously like 65 years old. Like
The comparison has been around an been made unironically since '67, retarded then, retarded now.
Man, i miss the simple times when all AGPs were sane and firmly in 3rd category.
Six million died, and six million survived.
Plenty of people did. And that's one reason why those aforementioned articles were eventually retracted.
A lot of people have been trying to do that too, but you won't fuck off Philip.
That's basically every single thing Ana writes. Dude just masturbates in written form by sourcing himself.
This is just modern "journalism" in a nutshell. Make bullshit claim citing an anonymous source --> all your scumsucking journo buddies mass reference your article --> your bogus claim becomes accepted as fact by the hordes of redditors, twitter freaks, and bluesky pedos --> issue retraction (which nobody will read) to avoid getting sued once people call out your initial article. Phil, of course, doesn't have friends though so he has to do step 2 himself.
