Oh, earlier she made an offhand comment that she was working with the lawyer for months. I imagine there was far more work done behind the curtain.
There is one part of the document which stood out to me the most. The salary question. She mentioned that they asked her about how much money she was making as a streamer and how much money she made on her Tech job. Niji promised that she would make more money if she joined them. Now that she got fired we can assume she has a Noncompete and that's the main reason why she couldn't stream. Given that her main source of income was her streaming gig, a noncompete could probably not hold in court as it would cripple her ability to make money.The first part of the document read exactly like a back & forth correspondence attempting to find grounds for a filing. She probably lost money from the Nijisanji time and would likely have some cause. But, as we went over in the termination thread, having cause and the ability to actually extract anything are very different discussions.
Got this from a Linkedin Article about the validity of Noncompete clauses:
3) Is It Limited to a Particular Activity or Industry?
The main consideration here is the effect the non-compete agreement has on the restricted person’s/company’s livelihood. If a person is a tailor and has been a tailor his/her whole life, a non-compete that generally restricts that person’s ability to perform tailor services will likely be held invalid, whereas if that same agreement just limited the restriction to tailoring suits, for instance, when the person is a dress tailor, the court will likely find that to be limited in scope enough to be valid because it doesn’t overly restrict the tailor.
Likewise within the tech industry, and other technical jobs that require specific skills, courts will likely hold blanket restrictions to be invalid. For graphic designers and web developers, agreements that state that a person cannot engage in any graphic design or web developing activities is overly broad. However, restricting that person from working in certain areas of web development or graphic design (i.e. certain coding languages or targeting graphic design clients in certain industries) is more likely to be held valid.
It is possible that legal action was already taken or discussed between lawyers and her document was part of the resolution because her reputation was damaged. If Nijisanji doesn't reply to the document she posted this is likely the reason.
@Azehara SHE'S LOOKING FOR EDITORS, GET THAT BAG SON
This is the video she said she wants the editing style to be like
Seems like too much trouble. I got a full-time job so I can only clip shit that I watch.