The amount of passive flexing this woman produces is unsustainable
Zoolander became memeable with retarded zoomers
Women will always have higher extremes than men. They're just much more rare than their male counterpart.On one hand Kaela's existence is reassuring because it shows there are women that autistic, on the other hand it's not like I'd ever meet one like that they are too busy at home playing videogames.
So yeah, good luck finding a Kaela for yourself.
That... isn't really how fair use works under US law at all. A VTuber streaming a game is going to fall down on multiple fronts:. A typical vtuber gaming stream is textbook fair use. They're adding new context all over the place both in terms of explicit commentary and just in the manner that they're playing the game, and the vast majority of people tuning into the stream will be doing so because they want to see those expressions by the streamer, not because or not merely because they want to see the game being played.
Oh I sure as hell don't want that, I have a reputation to upkeep outside of here. There definitely is a percentage of males out there who definitely do though. The disgraced femboys they are.You don't want a woman who will always be carrying you in a video game.
There's also substantial consumer overlap between people who play video games and people who watch vtubers.That... isn't really how fair use works under US law at all. A VTuber streaming a game is going to fall down on multiple fronts:
- It's commercial activity - they're trying to make money
- They're streaming a substantial portion of the game
- Video games are creative works, not factual ones
- It's possibly impacting the market for the game (people could watch instead of playing)
I don't know about Canadian or Israeli courts but if it ended up in American courts, the case would be dead on arrival. A typical vtuber gaming stream is textbook fair use. They're adding new context all over the place both in terms of explicit commentary and just in the manner that they're playing the game, and the vast majority of people tuning into the stream will be doing so because they want to see those expressions by the streamer, not because or not merely because they want to see the game being played.
It's important to remember this entire discussion is speculative. Fair dealing, fair use etc. are legal defences, and should an issue go to court much of the case will be umming and ahing over whether the defence holds up in that particular instance. The lists you usually see thrown around about commentary, criticism, educational use, parody etc. aren't a checklist of things you can do to be 'safe'; they're just factors that'll be considered when making a judgement. If you can show that your commentary during the stream is mostly discussion of the game akin to a review or that you're showcasing elements of a game to inform potential consumers, that can work in your favour, but there's no guarantee the court will agree with you. If the plaintiff's argument is that you're using their copyrighted material to receive ill-gotten gains, and a significant portion of the livestream is footage of their game in the background while you say "thank you Sneed McFeed for the twenty dollars", the court might agree with them instead.That... isn't really how fair use works under US law at all. A VTuber streaming a game is going to fall down on multiple fronts:
- It's commercial activity - they're trying to make money
- They're streaming a substantial portion of the game
- Video games are creative works, not factual ones
- It's possibly impacting the market for the game (people could watch instead of playing)
True. Used to play League of Legends with a friend of mine who was some shit like top 0.40% on the EUNE server. I was fucking trash-tier at LoL, like Plat 2 at best. She'd message me to play with her, ask me to lane with her, not tell me what to do or what she's doing, then get catty and passive-aggressive when I couldn't read her mind and perfectly sync up for a play she was making with no warning whatsoever.You don't want a woman who will always be carrying you in a video game.
True. Used to play League of Legends with a friend of mine who was some shit like top 0.40% on the EUNE server. I was fucking trash-tier at LoL, like Plat 2 at best. She'd message me to play with her, ask me to lane with her, not tell me what to do or what she's doing, then get catty and passive-aggressive when I couldn't read her mind and perfectly sync up for a play she was making with no warning whatsoever.
Then she'd ask me to play again the next day. It was like being married with none of the tax benefits.
She was kinda cute, in a dumpy NEET way, surprisingly wasn't a lardass like most gaymer girls.Was she hot. Actually forget that, did she like you?
Multi-factor tests with no dispositive factors are the judiciary's gift to litigation attorneys.It's important to remember this entire discussion is speculative. Fair dealing, fair use etc. are legal defences, and should an issue go to court much of the case will be umming and ahing over whether the defence holds up in that particular instance. The lists you usually see thrown around about commentary, criticism, educational use, parody etc. aren't a checklist of things you can do to be 'safe'; they're just factors that'll be considered when making a judgement.
Primarily in the sense that streamers don't usually fight DMCAs, though.It is very unlikely a game publisher will drag a streamer into the courtroom
The amount of passive flexing this woman produces is unsustainable
Zoolander became memeable with retarded zoomers
My God... such beauty...I can't believe Kobo just made a thumbnail mocking Karen's rotund size!
View attachment 21718