Once EN had scored it was over, EN was defending well at the end.
I think the total points tiebreaker system is stupid, and this shows why: defending was (probably) the wrong move. I don't know what everyone was holding points-wise, but if both teams has just gone for all-out dunking, they would have been better positioned for the tiebreaker. (yes you run the risk of losing a close game, but you're screwing yourself even if you win by defending)
I went and checked total points gained in the final 2 minutes; EN gained 394 (194 and 200), ID gained 362 (shut out vs EN, +363 vs. JP), and JP gained 474 (354 and 120).
Or another way to look at it, points
allowed in the final 2 minutes; EN allowed 354, ID allowed 320, and JP allowed 556.
So, as a whole EN was +40 in the final 2 minutes, ID was +42, and JP was -82.
TL;DR Those last two lines don't matter because JP got destroyed in both of those categories and still won. Defense doesn't matter in this system, just go score.