I was just about to post that.Tenma did it way better.
So what you're asking of us is to return back to Orange Woman Bad around here? If so that will take us to 1k pages by the new year easily.Super purge
have the timestamp when Kiara gets raided, she talks about that she likes her voice and tells her to apply for Hololive
Kiara was watching and further encouraging her after she finished her own stream
Mikomashi Suinye is back on her radio show
View attachment 6764
She talks about her post-surgery recovery. Apparently she was so bored that she went to Disney 3 times and had to hum a lot.
Audio:
The difference here is one statement is asserting that the reddit community itself are closer to being normal functional people, and the other is asserting that the crazy people in /vt are more entertaining to watch.I'll take shitposting schizos over no-fun allowed bunch of self-important losers.
EDIT:
Karen's released a teaser vid for her upcoming Sinderella album:
Bit of a departure from her previous releases as there doesn't seem to be a central theme and the sound just seems all over the place. There seems to be more prevalent/blatant autotune this time around.
Chii-chan is well-known for having dedicated antis who streamsnipe and harass her to a deranged degree.
It's a long story that dates back to about two years ago. I'll try to give a short summary off the top of my head.What an earth did she do to manage that?
True, but this exists in regular art too. There are court cases where the defendant was accused of using copyrighted work and being completely unaware of the previous work it was supposedly a derivative of. The rules of what makes something transformative can be a bit of a blurred line at times.Eh, not exactly. Trademarking has its own formal process, but copyright is a thing that just exists by default. If you make it, you own it. The exception to this is if you're producing work for someone else and they have you sign a work-for-hire contract, which transfers that default copyright over to them. You can safely assume that any (reputable) corpo owns all their character designs, and indie designs will belong to either the artist or the talent, depending on the arrangement between the two parties.
That's why the AI art situation is a bit murky legally to start with - to the best of my knowledge, there's no court precedent for it to establish exactly how transformative an AI-generated piece needs to be before it's considered legally distinct from the source pieces it pulls from. If it turns out someone's AI artwork is noticeably similar to an existing piece, the original artist might try to take action against it. They don't need to have registered anything anywhere, they can just say "hey, this looks like mine" and fire out DMCAs, starting a legal process.
I am sure I am being bit of a pedant here, so let me apologize in advance if you are already aware of this; but, just to make sure everyone is on the same page: the AI isn't "pulling" from the source pieces, it is a neural network that builds associations to entities/concepts during the training phase. This is necessary for computer to actually understand and perceive what that entity is. A computer can't perceive (or think consciously), so how do you teach it what a mountain is?AI-generated piece needs to be before it's considered legally distinct from the source pieces it pulls from